Skip to content

Comment on How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Automated Database Failoverparent

Comments

Thanks, I greatly appreciate the link! The deadlock scenario does not look good, however I think it won't be a problem in this particular application. But since a single server easily handles the load, I will definitely take the safe route and not split the writes, and just use the other db nodes as failover and for reading.

I was initially set on using NDB cluster to provide failover, but the table constraints (tables can't be too wide) means that there would have to be code changes. I recently set up and tried Galera, and everything "just worked". The application currently uses standard MySQL 5 with Innodb, and going with Galera would mean that no code change would be necessary.

It just sounded too good to be true though, so I just wanted to know that people actually use this in production. The application handles payments, so corrupted or rows not committing on all nodes would be a huge problem.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.