Comment on Preliminary data from a longitudinal AI impact studyComments−verdverm6moso far, we're still learning how to use this new tool, which is also getting better with each release−dude2507116moI agree, it was about 10.29% earlier this year, now we are standing at least at 10.35% or something.−verdverm6moThe last one that made the rounds was negative, so we have moved more than 10% in less than 1/2 a year−eucyclos6moThat's got to be more about processes around it than the tool itself though, right?−verdverm6moThe models released at the end of last year were notable because they finally became reliably useful, relatively. It's the same model generation that enables OpenClaw to work well, take off, and lead to the new HN rule
Comments
so far, we're still learning how to use this new tool, which is also getting better with each release
I agree, it was about 10.29% earlier this year, now we are standing at least at 10.35% or something.
The last one that made the rounds was negative, so we have moved more than 10% in less than 1/2 a year
That's got to be more about processes around it than the tool itself though, right?
The models released at the end of last year were notable because they finally became reliably useful, relatively. It's the same model generation that enables OpenClaw to work well, take off, and lead to the new HN rule