Let people decide that. This particular thought for example is interesting. Its about a shift in the UX of agentic development that i do feel is severly lacking. Its the kind of thing that seeks obvious once pointed out. People was to be partof the conversation. i think its fine if its not pa ckaged in a self important blogpost, its still worth reading
Comments
That's great, he sounds like a great guy ... when he say something newsworthy (on X or anywhere else), it might deserve to be here.
But his random thoughts on X do not.
Let people decide that. This particular thought for example is interesting. Its about a shift in the UX of agentic development that i do feel is severly lacking. Its the kind of thing that seeks obvious once pointed out. People was to be partof the conversation. i think its fine if its not pa ckaged in a self important blogpost, its still worth reading
People implement things based on his "random thoughts" (which are higher-quality than many people's longer-form writings).