Comment on Jails for NetBSD – Kernel Enforced Isolation and Native Resource ControlparentComments−LargoLasskhyfv6moDoes the third entry of the FAQ not suffice?−ggm6moNo. A feature table would help. An abstraction/layer diagram. A lot more.Could bastille port to it as-is? How about podman?−LargoLasskhyfv6moCould bastille port to it as-is? How about podman?He wrote things like these are out of scope.Just light and robust jails without further external dependencies.−PunchyHamster6moso it's useless then as you can't run anything you'd want to there−LargoLasskhyfv6moBesides the fact it isn't even ready yet, of course you could run everything which runs on NetBSD in there. Just not the ways you're used to.IMO anything which makes NetBSD's base more complete is good.When it is ready, it remains to be seen which external tools may be ported to make use of the newly available internals. If ever.
Comments
Does the third entry of the FAQ not suffice?
No. A feature table would help. An abstraction/layer diagram. A lot more.
Could bastille port to it as-is? How about podman?
He wrote things like these are out of scope.
Just light and robust jails without further external dependencies.
so it's useless then as you can't run anything you'd want to there
Besides the fact it isn't even ready yet, of course you could run everything which runs on NetBSD in there. Just not the ways you're used to.
IMO anything which makes NetBSD's base more complete is good.
When it is ready, it remains to be seen which external tools may be ported to make use of the newly available internals. If ever.