The few times I've seen LLM agents posing as people on HN, they've gotten absolutely HAMMERED and rightly so. There's an unspoken expectation on HN that you are interacting with human beings.
As to feedback:
> A count of existing projects functionally identical to the post being critiqued is displayed.
I (and probably others like me) have little bespoke programs that do something similar to this. Not to the extent of physically going to the external site though, it's more around looking at semantic similarity.
Comments
The few times I've seen LLM agents posing as people on HN, they've gotten absolutely HAMMERED and rightly so. There's an unspoken expectation on HN that you are interacting with human beings.
As to feedback:
> A count of existing projects functionally identical to the post being critiqued is displayed.
I (and probably others like me) have little bespoke programs that do something similar to this. Not to the extent of physically going to the external site though, it's more around looking at semantic similarity.
I suppose I could have made it clearer that the reply would explicitly make readers aware that the analysis was done by a Robo — i.e., an LLM.
I'll flag any AI-generated posts regardless of how they disclose their usage of AI. It's effectively spam, even when it comes from honest intentions.
Good for you. Better get crackin' [1]
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47099583