This vision of "no coding before 10am" captures an exciting shift—but it also raises important questions about correctness, maintainability, and the enduring role of human judgment in software.
I've been reflecting on these ideas (especially the claim that "code is context, not a library" and that you should "review the output, not the code") and wrote a response exploring why craftsmanship, elegance, and deep understanding still matter—even, or especially, in an AI-native workflow:
Comments
This vision of "no coding before 10am" captures an exciting shift—but it also raises important questions about correctness, maintainability, and the enduring role of human judgment in software. I've been reflecting on these ideas (especially the claim that "code is context, not a library" and that you should "review the output, not the code") and wrote a response exploring why craftsmanship, elegance, and deep understanding still matter—even, or especially, in an AI-native workflow:
https://deep.liveblog365.com/en/index-en.html?post=195
The goal isn't to reject AI agents, but to ask: how do we build systems that last—not just ship fast? Would welcome thoughts from this community.