Skip to content

Comment on Lessons from Zig

Comments

The Zig language, created by Andrew Kelley, takes a deliberate position on standard library scope.

I'm missing the significance of this callout. Is Andrew Kelley synonymous with/well known as a representative of a particular approach to language or software design?

...yes? Does he need to create more than one language to take stance on library scope?

I meant that the name of the language creator is irrelevant to the point being made in the article, unless the name has some out of band meaning that the intended audience knows and I do not.

Turns out the article is AI slop, so makes sense.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.