Of the things you've linked, none of them indicate anything new being brought to the table. So no, I see no merit in your comment. Each is an existing concept built using existing tools/solutions.
if some dude is writing 100% of their code using ai, then i stand by my point in that they're not doing anything novel.
Comments
LLMs, in my experience, can solve solved problems for you well. It is extremely rare they produce quality code for novel things.
therefore what I hear from an announcment like this is "we have stopped innovating".
this is a bad sign, not a good sign.
Curious opinion.
Is Claude Cowork not innovation? https://www.reddit.com/r/accelerate/comments/1qbg9bu/anthrop... https://jpcaparas.medium.com/the-claude-code-creator-says-ai...
is this not innovation? >> https://openai.com/prism/
A better argument might be that greenfield applications are currently way easier for AI to build out, I do concede that point.
Of the things you've linked, none of them indicate anything new being brought to the table. So no, I see no merit in your comment. Each is an existing concept built using existing tools/solutions.
if some dude is writing 100% of their code using ai, then i stand by my point in that they're not doing anything novel.
It's great to finally see pushback. Even 6 months ago, this thread wouldve only been a luddite echo chamber.
Sad that HN is so far behind the times but better late than never