Skip to content

Comment on Regulatory Hacksparent

Comments

Why do you presume it would be easy for them to provide personal injury protection across their entire inventory of rentals? The set of circumstances that led to their particular current coverage of theft and vandalism is worth revisiting.

Well, it's pretty much a textbook case for insurance: a very small risk spread across a large number of rentals where the worst case is bad. AirBnB has the advantage that they could tailor the premium based on the exact parameters of the rental.

If it's so straightforward for Airbnb to insure the things you're talking about, why is the "Host Guarantee" they came up with along with Lloyds of London so restrictive? For instance: if you let a place out to an Airbnb guest, and they forget to lock the door, and your place is burgled as a result, you're not (it seems) covered.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.