Blog post quotes from a Kevin at Microsoft, making him look like a naive cheerleader:
"On the other hand, choosing Microsoft to launch your career provides nothing but upside.
Don’t believe the hype. I admit I’m biased, but for tech jobs, Microsoft is your best bet."
But it omits Kevin's six reasons why it's nothing but upside, in between these two paras. Good practice would be to show via ellipsis that something was omitted. Better would be to give a more honest argument.
Comments
Blog post quotes from a Kevin at Microsoft, making him look like a naive cheerleader:
"On the other hand, choosing Microsoft to launch your career provides nothing but upside.
Don’t believe the hype. I admit I’m biased, but for tech jobs, Microsoft is your best bet."
But it omits Kevin's six reasons why it's nothing but upside, in between these two paras. Good practice would be to show via ellipsis that something was omitted. Better would be to give a more honest argument.
His "reasons" are more naive cheerleading. Frankly, I thought Kevin's post was so vapid that a response was unnecessary.
Perhaps they edited the article after your comment, but I see an ellipsis.