Ideally the architect is looking at a 'proposed' plan rather than what got implemented.
There is an entirely different (and very valuable) class of folks to can take an existing screw up and map out a series of steps to un-screw it up [1]. :-)
[1] I used to watch the New Yankee Workshop on PBS and see Norm cut lumber and then have it fit together so closely and smoothly that it practically didn't need glue. I suggested to my wife we could make a TV show which explored creative uses for a 2 x 4 that was 1/2" too short for its original purpose, or other parts that were made scrap by an imprecise execution of the 'cut to size' phase.
Comments
Ideally the architect is looking at a 'proposed' plan rather than what got implemented.
There is an entirely different (and very valuable) class of folks to can take an existing screw up and map out a series of steps to un-screw it up [1]. :-)
[1] I used to watch the New Yankee Workshop on PBS and see Norm cut lumber and then have it fit together so closely and smoothly that it practically didn't need glue. I suggested to my wife we could make a TV show which explored creative uses for a 2 x 4 that was 1/2" too short for its original purpose, or other parts that were made scrap by an imprecise execution of the 'cut to size' phase.