Comment on Netbot: An App.net Client from Tweetbot CreatorsComments−timmillwood13yI would sign up for app.net if they supported open standards such as OStatus.−abraham13yThey have committed to supporting open standards like Activity Streams, PubSubHubBub, and Webfinger. While not OStatus explicitly, it looks like the majority of OStatus will be supported.http://daltoncaldwell.com/a-response-to-brennan-novak−rwolf13yIt's important to note the careful hedging in that response. Specifically:* Activity Streams will be read-only, except through their (non-ostatus) API.* No subscribing through pubsubhubbub "initially." It implies but does not promise eventually subscribing.* Similar to streams, webfinger will be published but not consumed.* From context, the final clause about inbound and outbound syndication is through some non-ostatus mechanism.
Comments
I would sign up for app.net if they supported open standards such as OStatus.
They have committed to supporting open standards like Activity Streams, PubSubHubBub, and Webfinger. While not OStatus explicitly, it looks like the majority of OStatus will be supported.
http://daltoncaldwell.com/a-response-to-brennan-novak
It's important to note the careful hedging in that response. Specifically:
* Activity Streams will be read-only, except through their (non-ostatus) API.
* No subscribing through pubsubhubbub "initially." It implies but does not promise eventually subscribing.
* Similar to streams, webfinger will be published but not consumed.
* From context, the final clause about inbound and outbound syndication is through some non-ostatus mechanism.