Comment on GitHut – Programming Languages and GitHub (2014)Comments−steveklabnik9moAs noted, should be (2014).There is also GitHut 2.0: https://madnight.github.io/githut/#/pull_requests/2024/1This updates through 2024.−nightpool9moInteresting to see the number of JS pushes go down significantly, but actually realize that it's just because many more projects are using TypeScript:https://i.imgur.com/AJBE9so.png−threatofrain9moThe library space converged to TS far faster than the rest of the JS world. Also interesting to see the sharp rise of Go.−oceansky9moIf you sum both, it's 17.204%, which would place it at the top.−fuzzythinker9moNo usability consideration at all. Yellow on grey (top curve's) is unreadable.−philipwhiuk9moCreated https://github.com/madnight/githut/issues/122 with a possible CSS rule fix.−chromehearts9moWish it would look exactly like the first version−dgan9moDefinitely a worse design, curious what was the reasonning
Comments
As noted, should be (2014).
There is also GitHut 2.0: https://madnight.github.io/githut/#/pull_requests/2024/1
This updates through 2024.
Interesting to see the number of JS pushes go down significantly, but actually realize that it's just because many more projects are using TypeScript:
https://i.imgur.com/AJBE9so.png
The library space converged to TS far faster than the rest of the JS world. Also interesting to see the sharp rise of Go.
If you sum both, it's 17.204%, which would place it at the top.
No usability consideration at all. Yellow on grey (top curve's) is unreadable.
Created https://github.com/madnight/githut/issues/122 with a possible CSS rule fix.
Wish it would look exactly like the first version
Definitely a worse design, curious what was the reasonning