Comment on Dr Matthew Garrett v Dr Roy Schestowitz and AnorparentComments−pjc509moThey apparently didn't submit any, according to the linked judgement.−anonymousiam9moThey were prohibited from submitting any, because they neglected to file the form expressing their intent to file.Not that they would have fared any better if they had hired a solicitor. Their case was a loser.
Comments
They apparently didn't submit any, according to the linked judgement.
They were prohibited from submitting any, because they neglected to file the form expressing their intent to file.
Not that they would have fared any better if they had hired a solicitor. Their case was a loser.