Comment on Letters: A tiny debugging library for RubyparentComments−djacobsOP13yThat's the base case. It takes arguments, too, and if you give it a block, it prints out the result of the block called in the receiver's scope.−manveru13yWhy `p` though? That's a method on Kernel already and does puts(args.inspect)−djacobsOP13yJust changed it. I was hoping people wouldn't mix and match, but I don't mind using `o` instead:https://github.com/davejacobs/letters/issues/6−manveru13yThank you very much.−nagnatron13yCool, looks like a useful library.
Comments
That's the base case. It takes arguments, too, and if you give it a block, it prints out the result of the block called in the receiver's scope.
Why `p` though? That's a method on Kernel already and does puts(args.inspect)
Just changed it. I was hoping people wouldn't mix and match, but I don't mind using `o` instead:
https://github.com/davejacobs/letters/issues/6
Thank you very much.
Cool, looks like a useful library.