Sorry, you're altering to your entire point from start to finish with this 'minor' correction? Had you actually said "Sequences shortened" I wouldn't have replied. However you didn't. You said: "Sequences and screen images simulated" a different phrase that appears in ALL commercials that show a screen on camera.
> But nice pro-Apple shilling to make me sound like the bad guy.
Two ways to look at this:
1. Either you intentionally lied, so you're just a prick trying in vain to save some face.
2. It was a genuine mistake, in which case bravo on this humble concession.
"Sorry, you're altering to your entire point from start to finish with this 'minor' correction?"
Granted, I can see your point, definitely.
The next sentence in my original post, though, referred directly to my intent: complaints that the ad deceived as to how "easy (and quick) it was to do something on the iPhone" versus reality.
Comments
One apology: "Sequences shortened".
And, no - the 3GS was targeted for a class action:
http://www.wireless-weblog.com/50226711/the_iphone_3g_class_...
"Twice as fast at half the price"
The venerable 37S acknowledged that, as a result, the 3GS ads started including that phrase.
http://37signals.com/svn/posts/1328-apple-iphone-ad-sequence...
http://www.idownloadblog.com/2012/03/30/siri-la-suit-fake-ad...
But nice pro-Apple shilling to make me sound like the bad guy.
-- signed, an iPhone 4, 4S, iPad 3, 2G nano, 160GB classic iPod owner.
> One apology: "Sequences shortened".
Sorry, you're altering to your entire point from start to finish with this 'minor' correction? Had you actually said "Sequences shortened" I wouldn't have replied. However you didn't. You said: "Sequences and screen images simulated" a different phrase that appears in ALL commercials that show a screen on camera.
> But nice pro-Apple shilling to make me sound like the bad guy.
Two ways to look at this:
1. Either you intentionally lied, so you're just a prick trying in vain to save some face.
2. It was a genuine mistake, in which case bravo on this humble concession.
"Sorry, you're altering to your entire point from start to finish with this 'minor' correction?"
Granted, I can see your point, definitely.
The next sentence in my original post, though, referred directly to my intent: complaints that the ad deceived as to how "easy (and quick) it was to do something on the iPhone" versus reality.