Skip to content

Comment on Dempster-shafer and reasoning about setsparent

Comments

I think that's overly reductivist. In the general case DS operates on up to 2^M sets where M is the cardinality of the hypothesis space: worst case scenario. That's not true if hypotheses are hierarchical, or if evidence is frequently about the same set, or there just isn't enough evidence to fuse to get to 2^M.

In the worst case scenario there are efficient approximation methods which can be used.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.