Comment on RISC-V takes first step toward international ISO/IEC standardizationparentComments−Joel_Mckay10moA standard 64bit+DSP RISC-V would go a long way for undoing the fragmentation damage caused by the "design by committee" implications...it was the same mistake that made ARM6 worse/more-complex than modern ARM7/8/9. =3−kazinator10moAs if we have never seen design-by-committee damage coming from ISO?Have you heard of this C++ thing? :)−Joel_Mckay10moHave you heard of this C++ thing?The STL was good, but Boost proved a phenomena...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effectISO standards are often just a sign Process-people are in control =3
Comments
A standard 64bit+DSP RISC-V would go a long way for undoing the fragmentation damage caused by the "design by committee" implications.
..it was the same mistake that made ARM6 worse/more-complex than modern ARM7/8/9. =3
As if we have never seen design-by-committee damage coming from ISO?
Have you heard of this C++ thing? :)
The STL was good, but Boost proved a phenomena...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect
ISO standards are often just a sign Process-people are in control =3