Actions aren’t models, symbols, icons, indexes, even referents. They’re not statistically resolvable as they are specific.
The problem is the chasm between specific/arbitrary, grammar (which is code) and syntax. Only a non binary, analog system reaches there.
In a task demands vary realm that’s overseen by evolution (a psychological, neuro or cog sci definition won’t hack it) where any idea of causality is placed ends up looking like a clown show. It’s like stupid apes pretending “it happens here” in a Rube Goldberg monstrosity of possibility.
Comments
Actions aren’t models, symbols, icons, indexes, even referents. They’re not statistically resolvable as they are specific.
The problem is the chasm between specific/arbitrary, grammar (which is code) and syntax. Only a non binary, analog system reaches there.
In a task demands vary realm that’s overseen by evolution (a psychological, neuro or cog sci definition won’t hack it) where any idea of causality is placed ends up looking like a clown show. It’s like stupid apes pretending “it happens here” in a Rube Goldberg monstrosity of possibility.