Comment on Why don't you use dependent types?parentComments−turndown10moI thought that this was a GCC extension(you need to use #define n 10 instead of int n = 10). Is this not the case anymore?−uecker10moThis is in ISO C99. In C11 it was made an optional feature but in C23 we made the type part mandatory again.
Comments
I thought that this was a GCC extension(you need to use #define n 10 instead of int n = 10). Is this not the case anymore?
This is in ISO C99. In C11 it was made an optional feature but in C23 we made the type part mandatory again.