Skip to content

Comment on Why don't you use dependent types?

Comments

You just prove / use dependently typed languages / tla+ where it makes sense, not for everything. The latter might make sense if it's mostly automated maybe, but it takes really painful elaborate work to get full coverage and for sure most stuff really doesn't need that. I always think these formal methods + unit/integration tests cover so much that you are already far more robust than most on earth.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.