Even more yikes. They found a third-party LLM-generated podcast and made the policy even harsher because of it? What happens when they continue to run into more LLM-generated content out in the wild?
Interestingly, this is exactly the sort of behavior people have been losing their minds about lately with regards to Codes of Conduct.
I think it's that the low quality of the LLM-generated podcast caused him to reflect on the last year's worth of (apparently, largely low-quality) LLM-generated pull requests opened on the project; not that the podcast itself was the direct cause of the change in policy.
Comments
Even more yikes. They found a third-party LLM-generated podcast and made the policy even harsher because of it? What happens when they continue to run into more LLM-generated content out in the wild?
Interestingly, this is exactly the sort of behavior people have been losing their minds about lately with regards to Codes of Conduct.
I think it's that the low quality of the LLM-generated podcast caused him to reflect on the last year's worth of (apparently, largely low-quality) LLM-generated pull requests opened on the project; not that the podcast itself was the direct cause of the change in policy.