Skip to content

Comment on Visual lexicon of consumer aesthetics from the 1970s until now

Comments

Full of alot of hallucinations and misinformation not very useful nor fun/interesting.

It seems a bit off to me, too. It would be much improved if they clarified which of the names they invented, and which are canonical. They know about the 'Memphis' esthetic, which suggests they didn't just wing everything. The other names are unfamiliar to me, and I'd like to know if it is ignorance on my part or invention on theirs. The site is a great idea, at any rate.

This is a serious project that has been going on for over a decade. In fact, it looks like it hasn’t been updated very much for the past four years or so. So, most of the content predates AI hallucinations. If you can point out specific examples of ”alot” of hallucinations and misinformation, that would be helpful.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.