Skip to content

Comment on Read to forgetparent

Comments

Why would wide applicability be a mark against an idea? Do you feel the same way about gravity and normal distributions?

Your example is an excellent one though because it shows a corollary to the way that quote was intended in this conversation.

How it was meant: "It's OK to not remember everything you've read verbatim, because the important parts mixed into who you are/were."

Your corollary: "We must be careful about what we consume because it will be mixed into who you are."

That last sounds a little bit Vonnegut: We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.