Nothing, but calling it a movement aimed to fix broken publishing when it's just another walled garden that will disappear at the first buyout offer is disingenuous.
To clarify a bit: I am annoyed not by what the product is, but by the way it's marketed.
Comments
What's wrong with making money by providing a service to someone happy to pay for it?
Nothing, but calling it a movement aimed to fix broken publishing when it's just another walled garden that will disappear at the first buyout offer is disingenuous.
To clarify a bit: I am annoyed not by what the product is, but by the way it's marketed.
The editor produces vanilla html/css that can be transfered and hosted anywhere.
And I'm glad that you think its worth buying but we're not for sale.