So it takes less people than ever to start a company, and that's supposed to be a bad thing? They could have easily framed it as "its cheaper than ever to operate a start-up".
A more interesting angle would be to compare the total number of people employed in start-ups over the years, as a percentage of the labor force.
Comments
So it takes less people than ever to start a company, and that's supposed to be a bad thing? They could have easily framed it as "its cheaper than ever to operate a start-up".
A more interesting angle would be to compare the total number of people employed in start-ups over the years, as a percentage of the labor force.