"purely shitting on the submitter's choice of title."
It's the title of the article. It could also have been re-written by the admin's even if the submitter had chosen a different title (which no doubt would have resulted in less points).
Your comment smacks of "look what you waste your time on" in a belittling way. Perhaps I type fast, work fast and I'm not lazy and would prefer to back up the point I am making if I decide to make a point about something.
You're verbosely bitching that the article you got didn't live up to your expectations salted with the inference that the submitter was somehow whoringly complicit in your perceived deception.
Re-read what I said because the submitter was not "whoringly complicit" (I like your creative use of language by the way I'll give you an upvote for that.)
Comments
"purely shitting on the submitter's choice of title."
It's the title of the article. It could also have been re-written by the admin's even if the submitter had chosen a different title (which no doubt would have resulted in less points).
Your comment smacks of "look what you waste your time on" in a belittling way. Perhaps I type fast, work fast and I'm not lazy and would prefer to back up the point I am making if I decide to make a point about something.
You don't have a point, just an opinion.
You're verbosely bitching that the article you got didn't live up to your expectations salted with the inference that the submitter was somehow whoringly complicit in your perceived deception.
"You're verbosely bitching"
<CR's> are not verbosity.
Re-read what I said because the submitter was not "whoringly complicit" (I like your creative use of language by the way I'll give you an upvote for that.)