What's funny is he mentions the ZMQ in C entries as an impetuous but then essentially writes the list the way any novice C programmer _would_ (vs. expert/"leet" C++ prgorammers from the article). To me, this unwittingly plays into the "why ZMQ would be better in C" meme far more than the other way around :o)
I think that is somewhat intentional. C++ obfuscation gives folks a false sense of security about what they are doing. C programmers come out of school realizing they have to be careful. Nothing quantifiable mind you, just my experience in hiring them.
Comments
What's funny is he mentions the ZMQ in C entries as an impetuous but then essentially writes the list the way any novice C programmer _would_ (vs. expert/"leet" C++ prgorammers from the article). To me, this unwittingly plays into the "why ZMQ would be better in C" meme far more than the other way around :o)
See also <sys/queue.h>.
I think that is somewhat intentional. C++ obfuscation gives folks a false sense of security about what they are doing. C programmers come out of school realizing they have to be careful. Nothing quantifiable mind you, just my experience in hiring them.