Yes. It much more reponsibly admits the existence of plausible alternative explanations than the blog post does, and its page notes that it may not have been peer reviewed yet.
It also says In this paper, we present the first optical searches for artificial
objects with high specular reflections near the Earth. and was published only a few weeks ago.
Comments
Does it matter when they link to their source, right at the top, which points to
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394040040_Aligned_m... ?
Anyone can upload papers to ResearchGate.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283268416_Condition...
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331977356_The_elect...
Yes, yes. But have read the linked one?
Yes. It much more reponsibly admits the existence of plausible alternative explanations than the blog post does, and its page notes that it may not have been peer reviewed yet.
It also says In this paper, we present the first optical searches for artificial objects with high specular reflections near the Earth. and was published only a few weeks ago.
Give it time?