Skip to content

Comment on Quantitative AI progress needs accurate and transparent evaluationparent

Comments

Some beliefs are more supported by evidence than others. To ignore this is to make the concept of belief practically useless.

Yeah. My point is you have not seen any of the evidence. You just have belief that evidence exists. Which is a belief and not evidence.

Yes, we have seen evidence: videos, pictures and other artifacts of the landing.

I think you don't know what evidence means. You want proof and that's for mathematics.

You don't know that you exist. You could be a simulation.

But isn't that the same kind of evidence that the deniers also seen? They also saw some images and videos and decided to conclude the other way around.

The fact that I know I exist is the only thing I know for sure. Whether I am simulation or a soul or whatever word you want to call it is irrelevant.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.