Skip to content

Comment on Quantitative AI progress needs accurate and transparent evaluationparent

Comments

If every photo in streetview was included in the training data of a multimodal LLM it would be like 99.9999% of the training data/resource costs.

It just isn't plausible that anyone has actually done that. I'm sure some people include a small sample of them, though.

Why would every photo in streetview be required in order to have Geoguessr's dataset in the training data?

I’m pretty sure they are saying that Geoguessr's just pulls directly from Google Streetview. There isn’t a separate Geoguessr dataset, it just pulls from Google’s API (at least that’s what Wikipedia says).

I suspect that Geoguessr's dataset is a subset of Google Streetview, but maybe it really is just pulling everything directly

My guess would be that they pull directly from street-view, maybe with some extra filtering for interesting locations.

Why bother to create a copy, if it can be avoided, right?

Yet.

This is a good rebuttal when someone quips that we “are about to run out of data”. There’s oh so much more, just not in the form of books and blogs.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.