Skip to content

Comment on Quantitative AI progress needs accurate and transparent evaluationparent

Comments

True. And it's even worse than that, because each test probably gets "talked about" a lot in various places. And people come up with variants. And those variants get ingested. And then the whole thing becomes a mess.

This was noticeable with the early Phi models. They were originally trained fully on synthetic data (cool experiment tbh) but the downside was that GPT3 / 4 was "distilling" benchmarks "hacks" into it. It became aparent when new benchmarks were released, after the published date, and there was one that measured "contamination" of about 20+%. Just from distillation.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.