Skip to content

Comment on AWS merges malicious PR into Amazon Qparent

Comments

Exactly my position. I can’t realistically assess the potential scope of damage without a proper disclosure from AWS’s normally-excellent security team.

Your article breathlessly blames AWS for being reckless while having no real facts about the compromise. The whole thing reads like click bait.

You’re absolutely right that we don’t have a complete postmortem—and that’s exactly the problem.

I’d love to have real facts from AWS about the full scope of this incident. But instead of a disclosure, we got a version quietly pulled from the VS Code extension marketplace, no CVE, no changelog note, and a statement that reads like it was pre-approved by legal and sanitized with a pressure washer.

When a malicious prompt that attempts to wipe both local and cloud resources makes it into a shipping release of a tool that’s been installed nearly a million times, I don’t think “hey maybe we should talk about this” qualifies as breathless or clickbait. It qualifies as basic scrutiny.

And yes, I’ve praised AWS’s security posture before. I’d still prefer they lead with transparency instead of hoping no one notices the /tmp/CLEANER.LOG.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.