Comment on Java is still worth learningparentComments−imtringued1ySpring and Quarkus are not Java EE.−Xenoamorphous1yProbably OP meant that they are ubiquitous in Enterprise settings, no that they're part of "EE Java".−mqus1yYeah, they are "jakarta EE" now. Or what do you mean?−fiddlerwoaroof1ySpring has some compatibility shims for EE but my understanding is it’s always been its own thing and was originally formed in reaction to EE−ivan_gammel1ySpring is not „jackarta EE“, it’s compatible with some of EE specs (a good thing), but otherwise it’s just a different framework.−antonvs1ySpring is neither Java EE or Jakarta EE. It can integrate with those frameworks, but it's a completely independent system.
Comments
Spring and Quarkus are not Java EE.
Probably OP meant that they are ubiquitous in Enterprise settings, no that they're part of "EE Java".
Yeah, they are "jakarta EE" now. Or what do you mean?
Spring has some compatibility shims for EE but my understanding is it’s always been its own thing and was originally formed in reaction to EE
Spring is not „jackarta EE“, it’s compatible with some of EE specs (a good thing), but otherwise it’s just a different framework.
Spring is neither Java EE or Jakarta EE. It can integrate with those frameworks, but it's a completely independent system.