MAHA is weird because it correctly identifies that the shareholder driven food industry has completely warped health outcomes related to our diet. Then they completely miss the mark with their bizzaro and unfounded theories on the causes and how to move forward.
When you are, apparently, physically incapable of seeing the fundamental incentive structure surrounding the production and sale of foodstuffs, with the fact that consumers are for the most part takers of goods as the underlying problem, your brain starts to pattern-match on weirder stuff.
Comments
MAHA is weird because it correctly identifies that the shareholder driven food industry has completely warped health outcomes related to our diet. Then they completely miss the mark with their bizzaro and unfounded theories on the causes and how to move forward.
When you are, apparently, physically incapable of seeing the fundamental incentive structure surrounding the production and sale of foodstuffs, with the fact that consumers are for the most part takers of goods as the underlying problem, your brain starts to pattern-match on weirder stuff.