Your 2 space credits are worth their weight in dilithium.
Funny thing is the gem originally started exactly like that, pure explicit constructors. Then I wrapped it with the DSL sugar but the explicit approach never lost its capability. Both paths lead to the same destination.
I actually loved this suggestion so much that I added a whole section called "Captain Byroot's Guide to Explicit Circuit Construction" to the docs:
Comments
I'd suggest to drop the DSL, at the end of the day, a good old class with a constructor stored in a constant is much more more transparent:
Just my 2 cents though.Merci pour la remarque !
Your 2 space credits are worth their weight in dilithium.
Funny thing is the gem originally started exactly like that, pure explicit constructors. Then I wrapped it with the DSL sugar but the explicit approach never lost its capability. Both paths lead to the same destination.
I actually loved this suggestion so much that I added a whole section called "Captain Byroot's Guide to Explicit Circuit Construction" to the docs:
https://github.com/seuros/breaker_machines/blob/master/docs/....
The resistance appreciates your feedback.