The Model-Context-Protocol/Mode Control Plane mix up seems to come up a lot in AI slop articles. I assume its because most AI models’ training cutoff was before Model context protocol became a big thing.
We initially wrote this for a less technical audience (where we spelled out MCP), then edited it to post here - it's not AI, it's just bad editing from my part. Fixed now.
I'm confused by your explanation. You originally spelled out MCP and then edited it. Did you originally have it as model context protocol and then edited it to model control plane? Or did you originally have it spelled out as model control plane and missed it in editing?
Comments
"We’ll be using FastMCP, a lightweight framework for building model-control-plane servers"
Article written by AI (and not reviewed by humans) that doesn't know MCP is model context protocol?
Or author being intentional for some weird reason?
The Model-Context-Protocol/Mode Control Plane mix up seems to come up a lot in AI slop articles. I assume its because most AI models’ training cutoff was before Model context protocol became a big thing.
You can see it here too https://www.unleash.so/post/model-control-plane-mcp-for-ai-a...
And soon, articles like that one will be ingested into next generation of models, and they would become a bit more nonsensical...
AI models are becoming better and better though. Data quality is a known issue and this won’t stop scaling up
Looks like AI slop
We initially wrote this for a less technical audience (where we spelled out MCP), then edited it to post here - it's not AI, it's just bad editing from my part. Fixed now.
I'm confused by your explanation. You originally spelled out MCP and then edited it. Did you originally have it as model context protocol and then edited it to model control plane? Or did you originally have it spelled out as model control plane and missed it in editing?