I dunno a lot of migrations to X technology are pitched as valuable on one quality dimension. We improved performance by Y%!
I'd add that more often than not these performance impacts are not due to changes in programming languages/frameworks/libraries/whatever but because some architecture or algorithmic constraint is done under the scope of the migration.
Comments
I'd add that more often than not these performance impacts are not due to changes in programming languages/frameworks/libraries/whatever but because some architecture or algorithmic constraint is done under the scope of the migration.