There is no sign that LLMs are capable of general reasoning, on the contrary, so hold your horses about that. We have proven they can do basic composition (as a developer, I see proof of this every time I generate some code with an assistant) which is amazing already, but we’re still far from anything like “general intelligence”.
My argument is that we already have psuedo/static reasoners. CL will turn our non reasoners into reasoners.
CL has been an open problem from the very beginnings of AI research with basically no solution. Its pervasiveness indicates a very deep misunderstanding on our knowledge of reasoning.
Comments
There is no sign that LLMs are capable of general reasoning, on the contrary, so hold your horses about that. We have proven they can do basic composition (as a developer, I see proof of this every time I generate some code with an assistant) which is amazing already, but we’re still far from anything like “general intelligence”.
My argument is that we already have psuedo/static reasoners. CL will turn our non reasoners into reasoners.
CL has been an open problem from the very beginnings of AI research with basically no solution. Its pervasiveness indicates a very deep misunderstanding on our knowledge of reasoning.