Skip to content

Comment on Show HN: The Roman Industrial Revolution that could have beenparent

Comments

Honestly I thought industrialization was more about the relationship between labor, commodity and manufacturing than any particular technology.

It's a mode of production more than anything.

For China you had river power which also served as a major trading round.

One of the big blockers was that trading and banking was seen by many cultures as only moral if exercised without profit. Intentionally profiting was often seen as a form of theft so you needed the moral reclassifications of these social relationships before industrialization was incentivized.

So without moral judgment approving accumulation, your assembly line is just a logistical curiosity and not a revolutionary device.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.