Could you restate it? My whole point in this thread is that the article is knocking down an argument many supporters of "AI coding" aren't making. As I've just demonstrated, it's easy to find a skeptical argument that this "supporter" agrees with.
I mean I could but I think a better way to get to the heart of this discussion is to ask why you put quotations around supporter when describing the author.
Do you think he’s secretly against the tool itself or do you acknowledge that maybe the tool just doesn’t work for him and his use case and maybe he’s not nuts for finding fault with it?
Comments
Could you restate it? My whole point in this thread is that the article is knocking down an argument many supporters of "AI coding" aren't making. As I've just demonstrated, it's easy to find a skeptical argument that this "supporter" agrees with.
I mean I could but I think a better way to get to the heart of this discussion is to ask why you put quotations around supporter when describing the author.
Do you think he’s secretly against the tool itself or do you acknowledge that maybe the tool just doesn’t work for him and his use case and maybe he’s not nuts for finding fault with it?
I wasn't referring in any particular way to the author, just acknowledging that there are multiple kinds of supporter.