Perhaps a different monetization model would fix that.
The ideal outcome of a dating app [...] means you won't
need the app anymore.
I used to run a moderately profitable social site with a dating slant.
I get what you're saying. In a way, yeah: your ideal moneymaker is somebody who signs up for a $20/year recurring subscription and forgets about it for the next 30 years.
But that was not how I viewed things. There's always a fresh "supply" of people who are looking for connections.
Think of a college bar. You don't need people to become "lifer" customers. There are always new people coming into town.
In some senses, if you're running a "pure" dating site (ala Tinder, as opposed to something with more of a community/social slant) it's probably not even advantageous to have the same people hanging around the site indefinitely. Most people want to date local people, and they would like to see a constant supply of new local search results/recommendations rather than the same people over and over.
Comments
I get what you're saying. In a way, yeah: your ideal moneymaker is somebody who signs up for a $20/year recurring subscription and forgets about it for the next 30 years.
But that was not how I viewed things. There's always a fresh "supply" of people who are looking for connections.
Think of a college bar. You don't need people to become "lifer" customers. There are always new people coming into town.
In some senses, if you're running a "pure" dating site (ala Tinder, as opposed to something with more of a community/social slant) it's probably not even advantageous to have the same people hanging around the site indefinitely. Most people want to date local people, and they would like to see a constant supply of new local search results/recommendations rather than the same people over and over.