"Nature is...
A general-purpose open-source programming language and compiler designed to provide developers with an elegant and concise development experience, enabling them to build secure and reliable cross-platform software simply and efficiently."
That's true. However the website also promotes it as a systems programming language here and there. For example in the same homepage it says "Perfect for Systems Programming: Operating systems and IoT" and some other places like here: https://nature-lang.org/docs/get-started
I use Go for IoT devices in my work, such as routers and TV boxes, which run on RISC-V/MIPS/ARM32/ARM64, etc. I appreciate its portability; even on devices with only 512 MB of memory, I don't have to worry about memory overflow issues.
Comments
From the website:
"Nature is... A general-purpose open-source programming language and compiler designed to provide developers with an elegant and concise development experience, enabling them to build secure and reliable cross-platform software simply and efficiently."
That's true. However the website also promotes it as a systems programming language here and there. For example in the same homepage it says "Perfect for Systems Programming: Operating systems and IoT" and some other places like here: https://nature-lang.org/docs/get-started
I use Go for IoT devices in my work, such as routers and TV boxes, which run on RISC-V/MIPS/ARM32/ARM64, etc. I appreciate its portability; even on devices with only 512 MB of memory, I don't have to worry about memory overflow issues.
I believe nature is equally suitable.