You know, a patch file can individually address each upsteam file it intends to modify, right? I presume someone who wants to casually read them would need to fork the repo, cut up the ginormous .patch file into the 2361 individual patches for ease of reading or deep-linking
I also just for-real don't understand how in the universe a ~15MB text file against an open source _git hosted_ project is a sane way of delivering value. Not a single time in the readme did they say why $(git diff origin/tags/8.0.42...HEAD > yolo.patch) was the chosen delivery mechanism
Well, if Google does it then I guess I stand corrected about it being a weirdo way to deliver patches. They went so far as to .gz theirs, too, for extra non-browsing by mere mortals.
For Google it's undoubtedly only done because under the license agreement they must make their source code modifications available if someone asks. A form of malicious compliance if you wish
MySQL is available in GitHub (so in that sense hosted) but development doesn’t happen there. Not saying that’s the reason for the delivery mechanism though.
Comments
You know, a patch file can individually address each upsteam file it intends to modify, right? I presume someone who wants to casually read them would need to fork the repo, cut up the ginormous .patch file into the 2361 individual patches for ease of reading or deep-linking
I also just for-real don't understand how in the universe a ~15MB text file against an open source _git hosted_ project is a sane way of delivering value. Not a single time in the readme did they say why $(git diff origin/tags/8.0.42...HEAD > yolo.patch) was the chosen delivery mechanism
https://github.com/google/mysql-tools/tree/master/old/mysql-... - Google used to do that too
Well, if Google does it then I guess I stand corrected about it being a weirdo way to deliver patches. They went so far as to .gz theirs, too, for extra non-browsing by mere mortals.
I find it curious that <https://github.com/google/mysql-tools/blob/02d18542735a528c4...> and yet <https://github.com/google/mysql-tools/blob/02d18542735a528c4...> says "diff -ruN base/client/mysqldump.c mysql40gpl/client/mysqldump.c"
I had no idea one could release patches of GPL software under an Apache license. That makes my head hurt.
For Google it's undoubtedly only done because under the license agreement they must make their source code modifications available if someone asks. A form of malicious compliance if you wish
MySQL is available in GitHub (so in that sense hosted) but development doesn’t happen there. Not saying that’s the reason for the delivery mechanism though.