That essay on the water cycle makes no sense. Some sentences are repeated three times. The conclusion about the water cycle and energy appears wrong. And what paper is "Jenkins (2010)"?
Am I missing something, or is this regressing to GPT-1 level?
They should probably redo the demo with their latest model. I tried the same prompt on https://bitnet-demo.azurewebsites.net/ and it looked significantly more coherent. At least it didn't get stuck in a loop.
Comments
That essay on the water cycle makes no sense. Some sentences are repeated three times. The conclusion about the water cycle and energy appears wrong. And what paper is "Jenkins (2010)"?
Am I missing something, or is this regressing to GPT-1 level?
They should probably redo the demo with their latest model. I tried the same prompt on https://bitnet-demo.azurewebsites.net/ and it looked significantly more coherent. At least it didn't get stuck in a loop.
2B parameters should be in the ballpark of GPT-2, no?