What's the relevance of this? Since they're bandwith limited, using a more inefficient compression scheme wouldn't gain them any extra transmitted bytes, only less actual data.
My point was that delaying an expensive and years-long software project that's already prone to failure, just to replace a perfectly adequate feature with another whose only benefit is to impress the media, would probably be considered stupid. In my example, it would be to receive images as BMP files just to be able to brag to the media how much data was received. (Maybe I shouldn't have used images in my example software project since it confused people, but I blame Hacker News for going offline before I could make improvements.)
Comments
What's the relevance of this? Since they're bandwith limited, using a more inefficient compression scheme wouldn't gain them any extra transmitted bytes, only less actual data.
My point was that delaying an expensive and years-long software project that's already prone to failure, just to replace a perfectly adequate feature with another whose only benefit is to impress the media, would probably be considered stupid. In my example, it would be to receive images as BMP files just to be able to brag to the media how much data was received. (Maybe I shouldn't have used images in my example software project since it confused people, but I blame Hacker News for going offline before I could make improvements.)