Skip to content

Comment on 2025 AI Index Reportparent

Comments

You're the biggest hype merchant for this technology on this entire website. Please.

I've been banging the drum about how unintuitive and difficult this stuff is for over a year now: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Mar/11/using-llms-for-code/

I'm one of the loudest voices about the so-far unsolved security problems inherent in this space: https://simonwillison.net/tags/prompt-injection/ (94 posts)

I also have 149 posts about the ethics of it: https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai-ethics/ - including one of the first high profile projects to explore the issue around copyrighted data used in training sets: https://simonwillison.net/2022/Sep/5/laion-aesthetics-weekno...

One of the reasons I do the "pelican riding a bicycle" thing is that it's a great way to deflate the hype around these tools - the supposedly best LLM in the world still draws a pelican that looks like it was done by a five year old! https://simonwillison.net/tags/pelican-riding-a-bicycle/

If you want AI hype there are a thousand places on the internet you can go to get it. I try not to be one of them.

I agree - the content you write about LLMs is informative and realistic, not hyped. I get a lot of value from it, especially because you write mostly as stream of consciousness and explains your approach and/or reasoning. Thank you for doing that.

The prompt injection articles you wrote really early in the tech cycle were really good and I appreciated them at the time.

Could a five year old do it in XML (SVG)? Could an artist? In one shot?

It's true that simonw writes a lot about LLMs, but I find his content to be mostly factual. Much of it is positive, but that doesn't mean it's hype.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.