1. Uncanny slop "photo" of people installing panels, not even labeled as generated. There is zero excuse for this.
2. No links to sources. Either they are lazy or just making things up.
3. Wild swings in context and sloppy usage of terms like "producing electrons". A sloppy style can be fun to read, but it doesn't work here because it is applied inconsistently.
I'd like to read an article on solar in Pakistan, but this source is no good. The whole site is suspect when this article is tolerated on it.
Comments
I can't take this article seriously:
1. Uncanny slop "photo" of people installing panels, not even labeled as generated. There is zero excuse for this.
2. No links to sources. Either they are lazy or just making things up.
3. Wild swings in context and sloppy usage of terms like "producing electrons". A sloppy style can be fun to read, but it doesn't work here because it is applied inconsistently.
I'd like to read an article on solar in Pakistan, but this source is no good. The whole site is suspect when this article is tolerated on it.
I went looking for sources, and found some. Commented above: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43625728