I don't see any reason to believe this was requested by the Anaconda developers. For example, it refers to the Anaconda developers in the third person: "For example adding a footnote in a 2014 answer to state Anaconda has started restricting commercial usage is insufficient and misleading, as they have restricted nearly all usage later."
This seems more likely to have been written by some third party who'd annoyed about the license change.
Comments
I don't see any reason to believe this was requested by the Anaconda developers. For example, it refers to the Anaconda developers in the third person: "For example adding a footnote in a 2014 answer to state Anaconda has started restricting commercial usage is insufficient and misleading, as they have restricted nearly all usage later."
This seems more likely to have been written by some third party who'd annoyed about the license change.
Agreed, no signature, etc. I think it is somebody unhappy who wishes to hurt the ecosystem to hurt the company's future profits.