Skip to content

Comment on Ask HN: Is Washington Post correct in saying Signal is unsecure?parent

Comments

Unsecure in terms of being vulnerable to state spying on cell phones

Signal forces us to use Android or iOS. Doesn't it look suspicious? I would happily use it on my desktop with Qubes OS, but I can't do it without a much less secure smartphone.

If QubesOS supports Flatpaks sufficiently, then it might run the Signal Desktop app (though if you want to register a new account, you do have to have a phone number, which is also possible virtually these days anyway)

Yes, Flatpaks are supported. However the untrusted, vulnerable phone will have a full access, won't it?

Only if you use a phone with it. Does the official server actively filter numbers from VoIP providers?

As much as I want to say "screw the developer's nonsense, just compile it yourself and do as you please" honestly why bend over backwards to use such a platform when solutions such as Matrix are available?

I agree and use Matrix myself. I just don't understand the Signal hype on HN.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.